Wednesday, 31 July 2019

Infrastructure Problems

Some years ago, when I started my travels overseas, I was frequently horrified with the risk of 'trips, slips or falls' to which pedestrians were exposed. At the time, I considered that the United Kingdom handled these risks better. After the world-wide economic problems of 2008, my country entered a period of 'austerity' and funding for repairs to roads and pavements came under pressure. Despite continued emphasis on 'Health and Safety', I feel that my country has elevated itself to a position amongst the world leaders in terms of unrectified hazards to road users.


Pothole in Sandy Lane, Brewood

Part of the reason for these problems in the U.K. is the common practice of distributing services underground. Mains water, Gas, Electricity and Telecommunications, together with Drains for Surface Water and Foul Water (sewage) are typically buried in the ground, usually underneath the surface of a road. This is fine until repairs or alterations to any of the services are required, necessitating removing the road surface and digging-up the sub-soil until the required service is exposed. The obstruction of the carriageway creates traffic management problems, often addressed by traffic control using temporary traffic lights. The presence of the excavation, often a couple of metres in depth, also presents a danger to pedestrians, often dealt with by some form of temporary fencing. Requirements for signage to alert both pedestrians and vehicles to the temporary works further complicate matters.


Brewood Village: Temporary traffic lights and signage during connection of buried services to a house extension in Sandy Lane.

In the United Kingdom, I think mains water and drains are invariably buried. The same applies to domestic mains gas supplies but I was interested to discover (on my trip Caspian Odyssey) that in Armenia and neighbouring Georgia, gas is distributed above ground because volcanic activity can cause sufficient ground movement to damage buried pipework. In these countries, this seemed to result in an unsightly and sometimes rather'Heath-Robinson' arrangement of pipes, elbows and supporting brackets.


Brewood Village: Directly-buried underground services during connection to new houses in Sandy Lane. Note the printed identification tapes laid on top of the gas main (left) and water main (right).

Both electricity and telecommunications cables are sometimes carried above ground.


An underground multi-pair telecommmunications cable feeds a telegraph pole from where subscribers are connected by overhead 'drop-wires'.

Indeed, when telephones started to proliferate, they were initially invariably fed by two (less commonly, one) bare copper wires carried on ceramic insulators on the cross arms of 'telegraph poles'. In a built-up area, the number of circuits was visually intrusive but at least readily accessible for maintenance (if you had a head for heights).


'Openreach' Lineman working on a British Telecom Distribution Pole in Victoria Road, New Brighton.
As the idea of generating mains electricity in one place and distributing it to consumers over a wider area grew, it was logical to copy the transmission methods used for telephones by using copper wires carried on porcelain insulators on wooden poles.


Three-phase 'Delta' connected overhead electricity transmission line on wooden pole, showing connection to multi-core insulated cable leading to a transformer at ground level. The pole is stayed by two stranded galvanised steel guy wires, each incorporating an 'egg' insulator.


A 3-phase electricity supply being distributed by four insulated cables twisted together, carried overhead on wooden poles. A teed connection to a consumer is carried on four separate, parallel wires. Overhead 'drop-wires' for telephones are fed from an underground cable via a plastic terminal box. Note the 'Egg' insulator in the stranded galvanised steel guy wire.

As technology developed better electrical insulating techniques, it became possible to manufacture electrical cables where one tough, impervious sheath embraced a number of separate electrical conductors. For telephony, there might be many thin conductors capable of carrying a number of separate circuits. For power transmission, a small number of thick conductors were common. These cables could then be buried, removing the need for a series of poles to support the service.

Particularly for distributing telephone circuits in a built-up area, a large number of circuits would leave the exchange but then split to serve different groups of suppliers. This could conveniently be done by bringing the exchange cable into an accessible underground chamber where other cables could be interconnected, usually via an above-ground terminal cabinet allowing changes to the circuits provided and a convenient location for testing when faults occurred.


Termination chamber, Market Place, Brewood (during replacement of lid frame).

Power distribution often used inaccessible, buried joints to 'tee' power to individual users. In the 1950s, the Victorian house I was living in was finally connected to mains electricity (we'd previously only had mains water and gas). I was fascinated as the pavement was dug-up, the electric cable passing the house - the 'street main'- was located and the lead outer sheath removed to expose the individual three live phases, the neutral and (I think) the protective earth, each with its own electrical insulation. With what seemed to me very inadequate protective clothing and a few rubber mats to line the excavation, the jointer calmly attached the spur cable which would feed the house to one of the three phases, the neutral and the protective earth. Each joint was very carefully made and soldered for reliability. I presume some insulation was applied but I can't remember details. The remainder of the process involved making-good the sheath of the main cable and sealing the new spur cable so as to prevent the ingress of moisture. The joint closure was two pre-formed sheets of lead about two feet long, one fitted under the new joint, one on top so as to embrace the main cable, fitting snugly around the street main at each end of the joint and around the new spur cable. The two halves of the joint closure were held tightly together by bending over interlocking tabs at the edge of each sheet of lead before carefully heating the lead with a blowlamp and 'wiping' it with moleskin until a continuous, waterproof lead sheath had been created along the 'street main' and new spur cable.

Pictures around Brewood Village

The following album includes some examples of local services infrastructure:-
Brewood Village

Peak Rail 2019

Although Peak Rail ran a reduced service in February and March 2019, my first driving turn at Peak Rail in 2019 was Sunday, 7th April. I also describe a turn on Easter Saturday. The year then continued following a similar pattern.

Sunday, 7th April 2019


No. 72 on an 'Up' train pauses at Darley Dale on 25th March 2018.

The popular 'Austerity' 0-6-0 saddle tank No.72 which had worked the services during 2018, usually top-and-tailed with a main-line diesel (D8 'Penyghent'), had been retained as the steam motive power in 2019. In the morning, Mike S. was fireman with C. Ward taking over in the afternoon. Colin D. was cleaner all day and it was a merry footplate.

In the morning, Mike and I came off-shed at 08:30, in order to collect our driving experience candidate from Rowsley Station at 08:45, giving him two hours on the footplate. This time was divided between familiarisation with the locomotive and its controls, driving between Rowsley and the Up Home signal at Church Lane, operating Rowsley South Ground Frame to allow shunting movements to the loading dock at the north end of Rowsley Yard (where our driver was met by his wife and two children) and a little practice firing.

Apart from the 'pole' reverser, which was unreasonably stiff to move following maintenance work, the engine performed well.

Easter Saturday, 20th April 2019

Once again, No. 72 was the motive power. Robin S. was fireman all day. He'd stayed 'on site' overnight and booked on very early (04:15) so we were ready to come off shed nice and early and we sat in the platform at Rowsley, waiting for our driving experience candidate who enjoyed a 1-hour experience course, followed by a footplate ride on the first service train to Matlock Town.

The weather was bright and warm and we had plenty of passengers on all the trains. When we arrived back at Rowsley after the fourth round trip, we were informed that we'd started a small lineside fire. On that return trip (when we were being 'towed' by 'Penyghent') I'd seen a couple of people standing on the public footpath adjacent to the line, apparently looking at the track, but I'd spotted nothing untoward. Keen to ensure that any embers were fully extinguished, the Guard recruited help, loaded at least two five gallon drums of water into the Guard's compartment and we arranged to stop at the incident on our last trip to Matlock to ensure the fire was out. We stopped as planned and the Guard made a thorough job of dousing the area with water before completing the trip. Only a tiny burnt area was apparent and I joked to the Guard that he could have spit on on it to make it safe but, in very dry weather, lineside fires can be very serious and preserved railways may ban the use of steam locomotives during high-risk conditions. I described another lineside fire on the Battlefield Line in the post here.


Peak Rail 2019: A small lineside fire.

Related Posts on this Website

The 'Austerity' 0-6-0ST locomotive.

My pictures

Where necessary, clicking on an image above will display an 'uncropped' view or, alternately, pictures may be selected, viewed or downloaded, in various sizes. Within each album, photographs are normally arranged by date taken.

No. 72 - Austerity Tank.
Peak Rail 2019.
All my Peak Rail Albums.